Blog

Software that helps maintain accessibility compliance falls into a few categories: automated scanners that detect a portion of WCAG issues, monitoring tools that run scheduled checks on web pages, compliance management platforms that track issues and remediation progress, and documentation tools that generate reports and conformance statements. No single piece of software maintains compliance on … Read more

To evaluate current compliance status, an organization combines an automated scan with a (manual) audit, reviews existing documentation, and maps findings against WCAG 2.1 AA. The scan flags approximately 25% of accessibility issues. The audit identifies the remaining 75% that requires human evaluation, including screen reader behavior, keyboard operation, and content clarity. Together, these inputs … Read more

The WCAG 2.1 vs 2.2 difference is that WCAG 2.2 builds on 2.1 by adding success criteria focused on mobile interaction, cognitive accessibility, and authentication. WCAG 2.2 is backwards compatible, meaning content that conforms to 2.2 also conforms to 2.1. Most organizations referencing the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines today work toward either 2.1 AA or … Read more

To get started with ADA compliance for a website, organizations typically begin with an accessibility evaluation against WCAG 2.1 AA, the technical standard referenced by ADA Title II and widely treated as the practical benchmark under Title III. The evaluation identifies issues, remediation addresses them, and ongoing monitoring keeps the site in conformance as content … Read more

The WCAG 2.2 AA requirements are the success criteria a website or digital product must meet to claim conformance with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.2 at Level AA. WCAG 2.2 AA is built on the four POUR principles: content must be perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust. Conformance at Level AA means the product satisfies … Read more

A compliance maintenance plan is a written document that describes how an organization keeps its website conformant with WCAG over time. It assigns responsibility, sets a recurring evaluation schedule, defines how new content and code are reviewed before publishing, and records how issues are tracked from identification through remediation. A working plan is short, specific, … Read more

Accessibility scans should run at least monthly for most websites, weekly for sites with frequent content updates, and after any meaningful code release. Compliance scan frequency is set by how often a site changes, not by a fixed calendar. Scans flag approximately 25% of accessibility issues, so the cadence matters most as part of an … Read more

The accessibility remediation process is the structured workflow an organization follows to correct accessibility issues identified in an audit and bring a website closer to WCAG 2.1 AA conformance. It begins with an audit report, moves through prioritization and fixes, and ends with validation and documentation. Each phase has a defined output, and the work … Read more

Training content teams on WCAG conformance means giving writers, editors, designers, and marketers the specific accessibility knowledge that applies to their daily work. Effective programs focus on the success criteria content teams can directly affect, use role-based curriculum rather than full WCAG immersion, build accessibility checks into existing publishing workflows, and measure retention through real … Read more

Compliance team training prepares the people responsible for accessibility to apply WCAG 2.1 AA correctly across their roles. Effective programs cover foundational standards, role-specific responsibilities, evaluation methods, remediation workflows, and how to coordinate across product, engineering, design, content, and legal functions. Training is most valuable when it reflects the actual work each role performs, not … Read more